Bottomless inherited wealth, endless guilt.
Rockefeller “climate” grantee Nature, a longtime enforcer of climate orthodoxy against scientists and opponent of inquiry that could prove inconvenient to the cause, is back on the case.
This demonstrates an impressive commitment to recycling…Politico’s piece from last week.
Which recycled its June complaint about public access to public records showing who uses public institutions and how.
Why the fuss? Who knows, journos and climate activists like FOIAs, & of academics too! Of course, records have exposed how Nature (& NYT) work with dumpster-divers.
Transparency’s for others, & harassment when you do it. Where’s that Spiderman meme when one needs it.
GAO’s position on this question is pinned here, and after a recent round of this same routine was followed up on here.
Refresher about imitation being the most sincere form of flattery:
GAO remembers March ’25 when Rockefeller Family Fund reps tired of waiting for the NYT to run (again, pretty much the same) story they pitched in Dec, & called in WaPo. NYT hopped to & both ran the pitched story on the same day. Embarrassing, debasing.
(Bookmark this note that what’s really going on may be another of this team’s practices, prepping a recapitulation of sorts of this disgrace.)