Following up, most recently, on this post, GAO sees just how absurd it is for NASEM to purport to be any sort of impartial participant on “climate” science or policy, particularly as it pertains to the effort to rush in and influence the Environmental Protection Agency’s reconsideration and rescission of the 2009 Endangerment Finding (EF).
The larger production of correspondence of one reviewer using the resources of a public institution for her advocacy, NASEM EF reviewer Kristi Eli of the University of Washington, is here. Some samples below help illustrate the level of coordination on efforts to influence the EF and the public by ostensibly unbiased reviewers and some of the more strident activist groups and climate-plaintiffs’ witnesses.
